Discussing Life Is Strange Part II

Discussing Life Is Strange Part II is going to be more about theories for Episode 5. It’s still at least a month or more away from being available, and I’m obsessed. Can you tell? There are so many really interesting and cool things about this game. It’s story-based and takes zero gaming skill (or knowledge, really) and reminds me of a visual choose your own adventure novel.

 

After writing these two posts, I had a few thoughts when I read some articles on the games.  In this article, the developers of Life Is Strange, and they mentioned having real, live women on the team… as if this was some rare commodity. It was so sad to see that even though there are tons of female gamers, barely any women consult, write, or develop video games. Is it because none of them are trying? Is it due to sexism? I don’t know. But I have always wondered how to become a writer for console and PC games… Anyway, let’s get back to the topic at hand!

 

If you have not read Discussing Life Is Strange Part I yet, I suggest heading over there first.

 

WARNING SPOILERS FOR LIFE IS STRANGE AHEAD!

 

I have a few theories on things that I’m not 100% sure I can back up, but because I’m well-versed in story-telling tropes, I have an easier time figuring things out. (I called Mr. Jefferson at the very beginning of episode 1.) As far as twists and mystery, LIS is actually pretty damn good. I’ve seen high-budget films, books, and games that had much more predictable and lame outcomes. And because of the nature of the episodic format, the developers are able to make changes based on the fans’ reactions. No matter the ending, I’m so excited to see where everything is heading. So here are some of my theories. They are purely thoughts that I have and are in no way reflective of what will actually be in episode 5.

LIS8

1. Depending on your choices, someone will help Max initially get away from Jefferson. This one might be me projecting really hard because I want it to happen so badly. While Max will have to be the one to fix everything and save the day, I’m not 100% convinced she can get away by herself while being drugged up. My thought is that depending on your choices in the previous episodes, David or Kate could come and save Max. I almost thought that Victoria could be one of the options… but one could argue that she would have no reason to know where the bunker is. (I’d respond with the fact that she and Nathan were close and often drugged up, so there’s a chance she could know.) Some people even think Nathan is going to “redeem” himself and save her, maybe getting killed in the process, but I’m not convinced of this. I think it’s a bit too out of character as he has been established. David make the most sense, with Kate being an interesting possibility. My biggest concern, though, is that whoever does go to help her escape might end up dead (hopefully it’s not Warren or Kate!). And while David may be an ass, I don’t want him dead either… even if he did hit Chloe.

 

2. Many of the options you are able to choose can screw Chloe over in some way or another, which leads me to believe that there will be an option to leave her dead. My hope is that it’s just a way to make us really want to keep her alive, just like Max does, but there are so many options that are just mean to Chloe or hurt her feelings: letting David slap her and not taking the heat for the joint he caught her with, taking Kate’s phone call at the diner, siding with David during the family argument, having to let her father die, choosing whether or not to euthanize her second timeline self, getting her shot during shooting practice, etc.

LIS7

It concerns me a bit, but I hope the whole point of Max’s power is to save Chloe and stop the Prescotts (and the apocalypse for those who believe the Prescotts and the disaster are unrelated). Something that may support the idea that Chloe is supposed to live is Rachel’s spirit animal (the doe) and the storm. While my original thought was that the the storm was caused by the fact that Max is defying nature by using her power to constantly save Chloe, I’m starting to believe that her power was actually given to her as a means of saving not just Chloe, but everyone. I noticed an interesting pattern regarding when Max had “visions” of the storm. I noticed that several times, she gets the “vision” when Chloe is in danger or when she’s near Chloe. The only time this doesn’t count is the first time, which awoke her to her power… and then she went directly to where Chloe was to save her. I feel like this might support the idea that Max is supposed to save Chloe.

 

3. There seem to be some cult-like practices going on with the Prescotts, or at the very least, they have some majorly bad juju. Either they do weird and creepy things to keep their wealth… or who knows, but there were some interesting things in the bunker that seemed to indicate they knew it would be needed and that Nathan had to control himself because there was deeper importance to what they were doing. Similarly, I have a theory that the bad omens, and maybe even Max’s power is stemmed from the fact that the Prescotts are trying to take over sacred Native American land and that a girl was killed and then buried on the land. Technically, I don’t have proof that the barn or the shallow grave were actually on this “sacred” land, but the doe seems to be Rachel’s spirit animal, and it seems to fit that bad things happened and led to the crazy eco-issues.

 

4. Jefferson could be a Prescott. Now, some people claim that Jefferson could be Nathan’s father Sean Prescott. I find this to be strange because people have seen Sean Prescott. Could he be in disguise? Could he be a random serial killer who took Nathan on as a protege? I’m not sure, but I doubt both of those. For a while, I have felt that Nathan could be his illegitimate son and/or Jefferson was perhaps his uncle. Jefferson could easily be a pseudonym. Though, there are some artifacts within the game that indicate Nathan, his father, and Jefferson are all working together somehow.

LIS10

My somewhat outlandish theory is that they are stealing the life force (energy, spirit, something metaphysical) of the girls by photographing them. Some people might think this idea is crazy, but reading some of the messages in the bunker left me with this idea. Then I vaguely recall reading that the movie playing in Nathan’s was inspired by Nosferatu, who is a vampire.

 

5. It’s possible Rachel’s death was an accident or a death of necessity, not a serial killer. Go with me on this one; I know it’s crazy. I’m extremely interested in the fact that Rachel was found dead, but Kate came back alive. What about the other girls? We know there were many, many other girls based on the number of red binders in the “Dark Room.” Were they all murdered, too? If so, why wasn’t Kate? Now, there were some people who mentioned that Jefferson made a comment that “Kate is/was nothing like Rachel,” implying that Kate might not have been worthy of whatever he’s doing. This could make sense, and I somewhat like this idea… But I’m having a strong feeling that says maybe he doesn’t actually murder them at all. Wouldn’t there be a lot more young girls missing? At one point, when Max and Chloe are checking out the photos of Rachel and Kate, they mention that Rachel looks aware and pissed. Perhaps he had to kill her because she was lucid (or maybe he got her pregnant?). Nathan also seemed genuinely excited when he mistook Max for Rachel at the diner. If they were killing girls, it seems weird that he would have any feelings at all. I wonder if he was hurting over the fact that they had to kill Rachel (or that Jefferson killed her; Nathan didn’t exactly look coherent when he posed with her), which could also explain why he’s being so erratic and violent.

LIS9

6. Nathan: victim or serial co-conspirator/rapist/vampire/all around creep and jerk? Many people are speculating that he is a victim and that he isn’t completely a willing participant. While there are some merits to these claims, I don’t think we can entirely leave him blameless. We know he is helping drug the girls (or at least Kate) and getting them back to the bunker. We also saw that he remained present for the pictures, as he is seen in one of them with Rachel. However, he does appear off in this picture. Is he posed? Is he completely doped out? Is he a willing participant? It’s definitely hard to tell. To me, he looks out of it and grim, perhaps unaware of what exactly was going on or too jacked up on meds and drugs to care. Now, one could easily see him as a victim, especially when reading some of the notes that imply his parents are enabling his bad habits, he has psychotic tendencies, is medicated (prescription and other), and also may be a rapist. Could this all be a product of his upbringing? Yes. But could it also be partially due to manipulation, mental instability, and self-medicating? Possibly. I don’t think he’s 100% just the victim here. What he did to Chloe was on his own time. It didn’t happen in the bunker. That was all him. At some point, a person can only use “product of environment” so much when the truth is that people are who they are.

 

Okay, that’s enough for now. If you haven’t checked the game out, please do! It’s really an awesome story-based game.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Complete for security purposes. *