Along those lines, I have also changed a bit of my current projects. Originally, I was going to use an original story to write and illustrate as a picture book, but have since decided that I will be seeking a publisher for that story instead. So, to make up for this, I am going to illustrate my own version of the Pied Piper as a picture book dummy sort of thing. This way, I can use it as a portfolio piece and not worry about the things that troubled me with using my personal idea. So yes. Pied Piper. I’m very excited about it because the Pied Piper is one of my favorites.

I’ve also been thinking about this series of children’s stories I started a while back ago. I wrote a story for a class about a little girl who finds a key that opens a special door. Well, at the time I was considering turning the story into a series of short stories about other children who find similar keys. After reflecting on it over the past few days, I decided that I could easily fit these stories into a chapter book and add a final story to connect them all together. I instantly fell in love with this idea and am now working out details for the rest of the “chapters.”

Today, I was going through some writing exercises to see which ones work for me and which ones did not. One of the exercises I found that I liked very much and is useful to me is where you write a letter or email or note of some sort as if you were the character. I used it as an idea builder for one of my novels. It was very helpful. The note its self is NOT in the actual story, but the character names and creatures mentioned are. It was a really fun exercise and helped me get my creative juices flowing.

Adeleine,
I’ve packed my rucksack with the things listed below. Let me know what you packed as well. That way I can help you figure out anything else you forgot.

Salt

Bundles of Sage

Violet Buds

Gold Coins

Bandages

Silver Locket

Calendula Paste

The salt and sage should be enough to ward off any Wispies or Night Dwellers in the forest. The Violets will keep the Grendals away. They hate things that smell nice, so I will make a satchel for you to wear around your neck. We have to go to Oubliette for help before we get too far in. She will know what to do, but won’t help us without incentive of some sort. So, we can give her the gold coins for her help. Luckily, she’s lost her mind and loves shiny things.
The silver locket is another barter item. No one in Mora uses money like where you come from. We just barter. I am almost positive the locket belonged to Lady Lorynelle. We have to get passed The Lady to get to Duke Magnus anyway, so I’m sure it will work out.
Oh, and Saffron insisted that I pack the bandages. He even let Mint help make fresh Calendula paste, in case you get hurt.
-Ian
P.S.
Don’t worry. We will find Devkah. I promise.

If you try this exercise, please feel free to tell me about it!

[This post was originally posted on the nrwick.com blog that has since been deleted.]

That was almost 5 years ago. My husband has since read the book approximately 3 times while I, on the other hand, just finished reading it for the first time today, despite his persistent insistence. I have to admit that I really enjoyed this book. The Looking Glass Wars is a reinvention of Lewis Caroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. The Alice that many of us grew up reading about or watching is actually a princess in Wonderland, the world of imagination, who’s parents are murdered by her wicked Aunt Redd. While trying to escape death as her aunt overthrows the kingdom, Princess Alyss winds up in our world where she is trapped. After some time, she returns to Wonderland and must take back the throne as rightful Queen of Wonderland.

One of my favourite parts about this book was the correlation of Wonderland and our World. Not only did Beddor take a little bit of history into account when detailing Alyss’s time in the Earth world, he also implied that Wonderland was only in her head. I love stories like this. For all intents and purposes, we can assume that Wonderland is real and that is where our imagination, ideas, and inventions, etc. come from, but planting the seed of doubt adds a lovely touch to the story.

Alyss is well developed and her character growth is pleasing. She’s strong, yet vulnerable, which is great because often times strong female characters are somewhat mannish and abrasive.

I adore Dodge, even to the end of the book when I started feeling sad that he had changed so much. Like Alyss, I miss the romaticised child Dodge, but Dodge was the most human character in the book. He was flawed, emotional and he struggled. He and Alyss began as childhood playmates who were clearly enamoured with one another, but ended on distant path after being away from one another. Even though Alyss grew up in a world where imagination meant very little and Dodge stayed in a Wonderland filled with turmoil and fighting, only one of them was really able to get past their hardships and become the great person they were supposed to be.

One of my only criticisms about this book is the lack of description for key elements. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of descriptions throughout the book, but key beings such as the card soldiers and the chessmen were not described accurately enough for me to understand clearly what they were. Even though many things were named after what they were, such as Wonderland or Wondertropolis, a pawn was called a pawn and was only vaguely described. Was it an oversized chess piece that had arms? Or was it humanoid, but costumed similarly as a chess piece? I wasn’t sure because it was never explained in a complete way.

In the end, I rate this book a 4.5 out of 5 and will read the second book in The Looking Glass Wars trilogy sometime this year.

Why does this happen? The reason is due to the way most first person narratives are written. So many of them are written like glorified lists of actions and self inserts. It always feels as though the narrator is listing off things that happen, even if they are “showing” and not just “telling.”

Then, there is this bizarre concept that first person is not only more personal but makes the reader connect more with the main character. The idea that a reader can only delve into the dark depths of the main character’s thoughts and feelings through the use of first person is a destructive one when so many stories are prone to obvious self inserts and lack of substance. A main character that is devoid of their own well developed characteristics and mannerisms in order to be a place holder for readers seems more like a marketing ploy rather than an acceptable writing device.

In addition to this, I always wonder how skewed the narrator’s perspective of things are. It drives me crazy. If it’s unclear, then I spend the whole time wondering why I should care or trust anything they say. If the author’s point is to make the reader doubt the validity of the narrator’s perspective, then there should be clear signs of this. That doesn’t mean it needs to be ‘over the top’ or ‘in your face.’ Subtlety is acceptable, unclear is not.

This is not to say that there is a lack of well written novels in first person. I know there are; I read one about a week ago. Stephen King’s novella The Mist is written in first person. Had I known beforehand, I may not have picked it up despite my adoration for Stephen King. (Yes, that is the depth of my irritation for first person narrative.) However, the amazing thing is that while The Mist is in first person, it wasn’t distracting and it didn’t FEEL like first person. I did find myself wondering why the story was even in first person rather than third because it was written in a way that flowed as well as third person, but used the words ‘I’ and ‘my’ in place the words ‘him’ and ‘his.’ Not only did I not mind the first person narrative, I actually enjoyed it.

It was then I discovered that I don’t loathe first person; I loathe first person that is written this way for the sole purpose of attempting to connecting with readers. With this understanding, I bring myself to the dilemma of which narrative to use in my new WIP. Normally, I wouldn’t give it a second thought. I’d write it in third person and never look back. Even as I write this, I’m annoyed by the notion of considering first person. But the main character of my WIP is telling me her story and I am merely writing it down as a novel just as Stephen King wrote down David Drayton’s story in The Mist. Do I go against my instincts to write in third person, even though I know that if I write in first person it will have a third person feel, or do I follow my instincts and write in a way that I don’t particularly care for?